Jump to Navigation

Fort Worth Tax Law Blog

Fresh Start: Texas Business Tax Amnesty Due to Begin June 12

  • 14
  • May
    2012

about to get a chance to clear those issues up without having to pay a penalty. The opportunity comes through the state's Fresh Start amnesty program, which is scheduled to run from June 12 to August 17 of this year.

Texas state and local tax issues can come in several different forms for businesses. One is when your business did not file a tax report at all. Another is if you underreported your tax on a report you filed previously.

The Fresh Start program applies to either of these possibilities. It could also apply in cases where a permit is necessary for reporting and remitting taxes in Texas. It applies to several different types of state or local taxes, including sales tax and franchise tax.

The program does not apply to every single tax issue. For example, it doesn't apply to past filing periods that are already under audit or examination. It also doesn't apply where the Texas comptroller has notified a taxpayer of an audit or examination.

In this sense, the amnesty is limited. It applies only to tax reports that were originally due prior to April 1, 2012. And it only applies between June 12 and August 17 of this year.

IRS Audits: Many Factors Affect Likelihood

  • 08
  • May
    2012

The IRS does not operate in a vacuum. The agency is affected by political pressure to cut the federal budget, and for the second straight year has less money to do its work.

IRS audits may be affected by the reduction in the agency's budget of about 2 percent compared to last year. Partly as a result of this, the overall audit rate for individuals may drop below one percent for the first time in six years.

Of course, the IRS has ways to try to make do with fewer resources. For one thing, it tends to target higher income taxpayers for audits at a higher rate than those with lower income.

And then there is the use of technology. According to IRS Deputy Commissioner Steven Miller, the agency puts tax returns through a computer program in an attempt to spot returns that raise potential issues.

One aspect of this electronic screening involves assigning returns to "tolerance levels." These levels are based on dollar values or other measurements that the IRS programs into its computers to trigger potential audits.

In practice, what this means is that if a given tax return's financial reporting falls within the tolerance level, a manual review of the return is less likely.

U.S. Tax Court Lags Behind on Online Access

  • 30
  • April
    2012

Most Americans are familiar with the U.S. Supreme Court, in at least a general way. That is not the case, however, with the U.S. Tax Court.

If you haven't been involved in tax litigation, you may scarcely be aware of the Tax Court. But if you do find yourself in a dispute with the IRS, you will quickly become aware of the court's key role. You may also become concerned about the difficulty of gaining access to it.

The court's cases range from disputes about the applicability of the "innocent spouse" rule to multi-million dollar cases affecting huge corporations. About three fourths of the cases involve individual taxpayers.

Many taxpayer advocates believe that the Tax Court should strive to make as much of its work as possible accessible online. After all, with so much at stake, the administration of justice must be seen to be as fair and transparent as possible.

Proposed Tax Collection Technique Would Allow Pulling Passports

  • 25
  • April
    2012

Can the government restrict your right to travel out of country, just because you have a dispute with the IRS about tax collection?

IRS collection tactics are often aggressive. But a proposed bill in Congress would expand the agency's authority even further. If the bill is passed and signed by the president, it would enable the federal government to pull passports from people who have unpaid taxes.

As currently written, the proposed bill would do allow this even if someone with unpaid taxes has not been charged with tax evasion - or any other crime.

The bill in question is actually part of a much larger body of legislation regarding the authorization of federal funds for highway projects and transportation programs. The larger legislation is called the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, or MAP-21 for short.

One provision of the MAP-21 proposal would grant the State Department the power to "deny, revoke or limit" passports rights for certain taxpayers. Under the proposal, those rights could be limited for taxpayers with "serious delinquencies."

Foreign Bank Accounts: To Close or Not to Close?

  • 16
  • April
    2012

Life, as the saying goes, is full of choices. For holders of foreign bank accounts, those choices continue to require up-to-date information and an awareness of effective tax strategy.

Offshore account enforcement is a key area of emphasis for the IRS. The agency recently joined with European countries in an agreement to crack down on tax evasion and implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).

The IRS is also poised to scrutinize FBAR filings - the statements required for Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts.

So if you have a foreign account that is not in compliance with these stringent requirements, what should you do? Should you close it? Or would it make more sense to take advantage of the voluntary disclosure program offered by the IRS?

Keep in mind that closing a foreign account that carries past income and reporting obligations doesn't necessarily settle the matter. In fact, those obligations even exist for this year, up until the date that you actually close the account.

To be sure, these past reporting requirements don't carry on indefinitely. But they may remain valid for up to six years - and that's a long time.

IRS Audits Could be Eased by Video Conferencing

  • 09
  • April
    2012

The IRS is supposed to be accessible to taxpayers. That is why the agency's Taxpayer Advocate service is starting to conduct a pilot project on the use of teleconferences between case workers and taxpayers who have questions.

IRS audits are another possible forum for videoconferences. Nina Olson, the National Taxpayer Advocate, has recommended that the agency develop the technological capacity to offer "virtual face-to-face audits" in the near future.

The need for such a service is made more compelling by ongoing problems with the process for correspondence-based exams. The IRS has been increasingly using the corr-exam procedure, despite the fact that taxpayers are much less likely to respond to it than to an audit notice.

The lack of response to corr exam notices is often due to the confusing nature of the notice - not to taxpayer indifference about the outcome.

The Taxpayer Advocate is firmly opposed to wide usage of corr exams. She argues that too often they can become an "unnavigable labyrinth" for taxpayers.

Audit Shows IRS Often Lacked Proper Proof on Employee Screening Procedures

  • 03
  • April
    2012

It's no secret that dealing with the IRS is best done with plenty of documentation. To protect yourself against an audit, or to handle one if it occurs, it's helpful to have your tax records in good order.

When you do, IRS audits are much more manageable.

So you'd think that the agency itself would follow through on its own internal procedures. But according to an audit of the IRS released last month, the agency frequently lacked proof that people hired as IRS employees had been properly investigated for truthfulness and possible security issues.

The audit of IRS employee-screening procedures was done by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. The inspector found that in 507 of the 662 hiring actions under review, the IRS employment office did not have records to show that proper background checks had been conducted.

The regulations on the books say that job applicants to the IRS must submit to a rigorous screening process. This is supposed to include fingerprint checks using FBI records, for example, as well as verification that the applicant has fulfilled his or her tax obligations in the previous three years.

Chance of IRS Audit Varies by Income Level

  • 27
  • March
    2012

A basic principle of the tax collection system should be fairness. For the system to work, people of all income levels -rich, poor and middle class alike - should get equal treatment from the IRS.

And yet IRS audits are very much skewed toward higher income taxpayers.

That is what the evidence shows. Overall, 1.1 percent of taxpayers were audited in 2011. But the rate of audits varied widely by income level. To be more precise, the rate gets higher for each level of income over $100,000.

For taxpayers with adjusted gross income between $100,000 and $200,000, the IRS audited 1.0 percent of returns last year. The audit rate for incomes between $200,000 and $500,000 was 2.7 percent and between $500,000 and $1 million it was 5.3 percent.

For those with incomes over $1 million, it was even higher. For taxpayers with incomes from $1 million to $5 million, the audit rate was 11.8 percent. This was a very substantial increase from 2010, when the rate for taxpayers in that income category was approximately 7 percent.

Deductions Are an Important Part of Tax Strategy

  • 22
  • March
    2012

A smart tax strategy means looking for all of the legitimate deductions that may benefit you. Even if some of them seem downright silly, it's still important to know about the ones that may apply to you.

After all, there is big difference between using deductions intelligently, on the one hand, and criminal tax evasion on the other. Deductions help you to avoid more tax than you have to, which is perfectly legitimate.

So what are some of the more unusual deductions?

Consider, for example, a professional bodybuilder who needed to use loads of body oil during competitions to make his rippling muscles gleam. He claimed a tax deduction for the oil. When the IRS questioned the deduction, the bodybuilder took the issue to tax court - and won.

It's also worth noting that the rules on deductions for medical expenses are often quite expansive. In one case, a taxpayer with emphysema installed a home swimming pool because his doctor had ordered an exercise program. Regular swimming in the pool enhanced his breathing ability.

Increased Use of Corr-Exams Compared to Audits Is Cause For Concern

  • 13
  • March
    2012

An IRS audit isn't a criminal proceeding in which the right to confront accusers literally applies.

There is still a big difference, however, between face-to-face IRS audits on the one hand, and so-called "corr exams" (correspondence-based exams) on the other.

This week, the National Taxpayer Advocate questioned the increasing use of correspondence exams. From fiscal year 2000 to fiscal year 2011, face-to-face audits increased by 56 percent, from 251,108 to 391,621. But correspondence-based exams increased far more - by 220 percent. In eleven years, they increased from 366,657 to 1.173,069.

The Taxpayer Advocate questions the fairness of this trend. "Today the IRS generally reserves face-to-face individual audits for the most affluent taxpayers," wrote Nina Olson, the taxpayer advocate, in a blog post.

Taxpayers are far less likely to respond to notice of a face-to-face audit than to a corr-exam. This can easily result in valid tax claims being denied by the IRS.